zachxbt 质疑链上声誉评分网站：诈骗与付费推广的判定标准难以界定

RT by @zachxbt: It’s quite nuanced so I am not sure how much benefit a site would end up having. Majority of CT is not capable of thinking critically about the following: -what’s the threshold for number of scams promoted before it’s malicious? -what’s the threshold for undisclosed paid shills before it’s malicious vs accidental? -when is it fair to call a project a scam vs failure? (people call projects a scam because the token price never went up or the token was never launched) -when can you forgive people for past mistakes? -what burden of proof is considered as evidence? (people get falsely accused of being paid shills without evidence and it gets a lot of engagement on X bc they’re controversial) There’s a difference between doing 1-2 paid promotions with the same legit brand for months or years vs multiple per week with a questionable brand. Ethos made an attempt at reputation however it was abused by low quality farmers. Majority of CT would see a name on the site and immediate

来源：zachxbt · x.com